The impressive Maestra Cynthia Katsarelis and the Pro Musica Colorado Chamber Orchestra
October 22, 2011, 4:08 pm
Filed under:
Reviews | Tags:
Bruce Barrie,
Carson Keeble,
Charley Samson,
Cynthia Katsarelis,
Deborah Marshall,
Igor Stravinsky,
Joey Grimmer,
K.138,
Michael Tetreault,
Mozart,
Paul Erhard,
Pro Musica Coloardo Chamber Orchestra,
Stacy LeSartre,
Symphony Nr. 25,
The Soldiers Tale
A couple of weeks ago, I wrote that this had been a remarkable season so far, and that I have heard many fine performances. That trend has certainly continued with the performance Friday night, October 21, of the Pro Musica Colorado Chamber Orchestra at St. John’s Cathedral on Washington and 14th in Denver. This was the first performance of the Pro Musica that I have heard – it is a relatively new group – but when I looked at the program and at the website for this organization, I was quite surprised at the quality of the musicians who perform in this orchestra. Some will say that I should’ve known better, but there are so many groups performing this season, and many of them are quite good. Pro Musica Colorado is no exception; in fact, they are on one of the higher rungs.
Maestra Cynthia Katsarelis is the conductor of this group, and I will quote from the website:
“She has conducted excellent professional, conservatory, youth and training orchestras. As Conducting Assistant with the Cincinnati Symphony and Pops, Ms. Katsarelis worked with top conductors and guest artists, assisted with recordings for Telarc Records, and worked with James Conlon and the Cincinnati May Festival. Her professional activities include conducting the Buffalo Philharmonic, and the symphonies of Knoxville, Kansas City, Spokane, Flint, Georgetown and the Columbus Women’s Orchestra. She made her international debut leading the Bourgas Philharmonic in Bourgas, Bulgaria. Ms. Katsarelis has served as music director of the Seven Hills Sinfonietta, Antioch Chamber Orchestra, Northern Kentucky Chamber Players, Dearborn Summer Music Festival and Hillman Opera. Critical reviews have praised her work as “[‘] a model of precision and spirit.[‘]”
“In Colorado, Ms. Katsarelis was invited to assist the Colorado Music Festival by conducting the offstage brass in Mahler’s Symphony No. 2, the “Resurrection.” For three summers, she conducted the Young Artist Seminar at Rocky Ridge Music Center. Working with the Loveland Opera Theatre, Ms. Katsarelis led performances of Hansel and Gretel in 2010 and leads H.M.S. Pinafore in February of 2012. She has conducted the Longmont Ballet in the Nutcracker with the professional ballet chamber orchestra.
“Ms. Katsarelis studied violin and conducting at the Peabody Conservatory of Music of the Johns Hopkins University, earning a Bachelor and a Master of Music degree. She was the first undergraduate ever admitted to the conducting program. At the College-Conservatory of Music in Cincinnati, she pursued doctoral studies in Orchestral and Opera Conducting. There she served as assistant conductor for both conservatory orchestras and the opera theater. She has studied at the Oregon Bach Festival with Helmuth Rilling and also participated in master classes led by Neema Jarvi, Michael Tilson Thomas, Kenneth Kiesler, Yoel Levi and Marin Alsop. She began her professional career at the age of 18 as a section violinist in the Florida Orchestra.”
The Pro Musica performed two works Friday evening, and they opened the program with Igor Stravinsky’s The Soldiers Tale. Igor Stravinsky, of course, was one of the 20th century’s most innovative and important composers, and he had a far-reaching influence that dominated his art in a way that few other composers can match. He changed the way we think about rhythm and harmony, and he always was evolving into something new. I have written about The Soldier’s Tale in previous reviews, and I must say at the outset, that this is, perhaps, my favorite piece by Stravinsky. Because its original score involved music, narration, and dancing, it truly is a theater/chamber work, but, unfortunately, a production which makes use of the dancing is rare. The story involves a soldier who has deserted (this is not elaborated on, and is not stressed in the production), and is on his way home. He has a violin in his backpack which the Devil wins from him, and in the end, the Devil wins his soul as well as that of the Princess. The Narrator, aptly done by KVOD’s Charley Samson, the Soldier, and the Devil, are the speaking parts, while the Princess and the Devil are both required to dance in the original score. The performance Friday night did not include dancing, and this is a proper arrangement of the score. Some performances do not even include the Narrator, and that arrangement is thus listed as a “Suite.” Stravinsky, himself, made these three arrangements.
Aside from Charley Samson, who was the Narrator, the musicians were Stacy LeSartre, violin; Paul Erhard, Bass; Debra Marshall, clarinet; Joey Grimmer, bassoon; Bruce Barrie, trumpet; Carson Keeble, trombone; and Michael Tetreault, percussion.
Some years ago, I was able to speak to some performers immediately after hearing this work, and they raised a most interesting point. They told me – and keep in mind that this is a small ensemble – that if one performer listens to the other instruments rather than watch the conductor and count, all will be lost in a mass of confusion. Keep in mind that all musicians are trained to listen, but all reliable musicians must count. This is just another example of how the complex rhythms and their difficulties that Stravinsky employs can affect the musicians.
The performance Friday night was absolutely superb. Stacy LeSartre, the violinist, and Debra Marshall, the clarinetist, amazed me with their punctuation of the rhythms which is so important to this work. They were implacably accurate and their accents were completely together. But when I say that, I am not ignoring the other five in this ensemble. Joey Grimmer, who performed on bassoon, was the standout musician, if I had to vote for one. But it is so wonderful to hear a performance of a small group of musicians where everyone is so evenly matched. This piece requires the musicians to perform with a great deal of vivacity, and that they certainly did. It was wonderful. In the opening, there were moments when the instruments slightly covered Mr. Samson, even though he had a microphone. It did not happen often, and it did teach me to become very attentive to the narration. Samson’s approach to the narration was one of almost, and I stress almost, casual conversation. Every time I have heard this piece, every narrator has his own style, and that is the way it should be, though, for my part I am accustomed to a little more drama and mysteriousness. The only aspect that grated on my nerves was when the Devil is trying to convince the Soldier that he can have anything he wishes in trade for the violin, Mr. Samson ad-libbed “a loaded iPod.” Granted, the audience chuckled, but I am of the opinion that this is (in spite of the almost cheerful music) a serious “tale,” and in addition, why change or modernize such a successful and original composition? It draws attention away from the work itself.
Bruce Barrie, trumpet, has remarkable tone. It was warm even when it was lively. But you must understand that the entire ensemble was truly excellent. This piece is so difficult, in so many ways, that it takes superb musicians to perform it.
Maestra Katsarelis gave the piece remarkable life (Do you see how many times the word remarkable appears?), and she conducts in a very vigorous fashion, with large movements, so as to insist that the ensemble count, and not be lured by the temptation to just listen. I am quite sure that Stravinsky would have been very pleased with this performance.
Following the intermission, the Pro Musica Colorado Chamber Orchestra performed Mozart’s Symphony Nr. 25 in G minor, K. 183. As Maestra Katsarelis pointed out, Mozart wrote only one other Symphony in G minor, and that, of course, is Nr. 40, K. 550. The use of minor keys was rare in the 18th century, but Mozart did use minor keys in the Piano Quartet, K. 478, and the String Quintet, K. 516.
There are several works by Mozart that are unfinished, and yet have the name “Symphony,” and some are almost serenades. But this Symphony, K. 183, is a full-blown four movement Symphony in the style of Haydn, and not at all related to the three movement structure of the Italian overture.
Curt Sachs says of K. 183: “One can seek in vain for a typically German or natural Italian characteristic element. In a fortunate moment in history, these two extreme stylistic components merged together in Mozart’s being, in beauty and spirit, drama and music, vocal and instrumental parts, and melodic line and instrumentation, merged together into a harmonic unity.”
It is my opinion that this is the first truly forceful symphony that Mozart wrote, and much has been made of the Sturm und Drang (Storm and Stress) that exemplifies this work. Maestra Katsarelis pointed out to the audience the nervous energy and syncopation that opens the first movement. When she began conducting, her movements were indeed forceful and extremely energetic. It sets the audience on notice that the musical statement made is very strong. In addition, it helps to accentuate the B theme group of this sonata-allegro first movement, because the B theme group is in a major key, and yet, in the recapitulation, the B theme comes back in a minor key. In some ways, this is not unusual, because one must end in the key one began (in the sonata – allegro structure of a first movement, there is an A theme, a B theme, a Development section, and then a Recapitulation, where the main themes return). But it certainly does add a forbidding aura to the entire first movement.
The orchestra was truly sensational in the performance of this entire symphony. Aside from the drive and energy and frantic feel of the first movement, the most outstanding attribute was the very well done dynamics. Cynthia Katsarelis is a very good conductor and she knows how to gesture and cajole the orchestra into doing exactly what she knows Mozart wants. She obtained from this chamber orchestra so many levels of piano and forte that I was amazed. Her conducting, especially in the second movement, was active, and yet, extremely sensitive. Again, I was struck by the quality of the bassoon playing in the second movement (they must figure out a way to keep Joey Grimmer in the orchestra permanently). I was also struck at how well balanced the entire ensemble was.
I do not have a score to this symphony, so I cannot check to see if the third movement has any label on it aside from Menuetto. But it is very terse and very stern, which is totally unlike any menuet danced at court. Beethoven was only three years old when Mozart wrote this work, but it almost seems as if Mozart was anticipating a new direction the symphonic style might take in someone else’s hands. In some ways, its spirit resembles his Symphony Nr. 38, “the Prague,” which is still in the future. The fourth movement of this work has as much drive and energy as the first movement, and Katsarelis never wavered one bit in her ability to draw this from the entire ensemble. I am full of wonder as to how this orchestra was able to get such a fine violin section, simply because some of the community orchestras here in Denver seem to have such difficulty. All of the strings in the Pro Musica Colorado Chamber Orchestra are excellent, and they have a fine concert master in the person of Stacy LeSartre.
In the program, only five board members are listed, and one of those is Maestro Katsarelis who is probably ex officio. There is quite a list of volunteers which is absolutely terrific, but I would humbly suggest that they try for a larger board, so that they have more people to concentrate on publicity and fundraising. Publicity is what this organization needs. This is a fine group of musicians that performs at an incredible professional level.
They demonstrated Friday evening that they can make everything musical a very special case. They need to be heard.
Franz Liszt does not need “fun” embellishments
Last week, as I was listening to Colorado Public Radio, I heard the announcements about the station celebrating the 200th birthday of the composer and pianist, Franz Liszt. The statements were made by a young lady who is one of the music hosts on KVOD. One would think that in such a position, one would realize that there is a certain responsibility to have some truth in what is said about one of the most illustrious composer/pianist’s of all time.
However, apparently in order to create an audience for the stations celebration on October 22, some of the most outlandish myths and comparisons were made. I was so amazed at some of the statements, that I went to the website of Colorado Public Radio, and I found the article which was read by this young lady over the air. In fact, she had also written the article. To begin with, she compares Liszt’s hair to rock ‘n roll legends “… Like Jimmy Page, Ted Nugent and Eddie Van Halen…” Yes, Liszt did have an almost Dutch boy style haircut, but everybody in his lifetime, Chopin, Schumann, and Berlioz did as well. And she accurately quotes Sir Charles Hallé when Hallé relates how Liszt’s hair fell down in his face while he was performing. Of course, the same thing happened to Chopin when he played and to Berlioz when he conducted. She goes on to make the outlandish statement that women threw their underwear on stage in appreciation (and perhaps, invitation?). That never happened. As a matter of fact, I have no idea why she thinks she is making a truthful statement. But, it certainly is true that Liszt “invented” the solo recital. So did Clara Schumann. But Liszt was a prodigious virtuoso, and he was very good-looking, and he would occasionally drop his gloves on stage or a cigar butt. When the women in the audience noticed that, they would clamor on stage to retrieve them. But, I have been told that in that time period, that women’s underwear would have been almost impossible to remove unless the dress came off first. I can assure you that never happened at a Liszt recital or concert.
Yes, Liszt did inspire all kinds of rumors because he was the first to do so many things, and some rumors were true. But, many were not. For example, there is a myth that Beethoven, upon hearing Liszt perform in 1823 when Liszt was twelve, mounted the stage and kissed young Liszt on the forehead, proclaiming him a genius. In fact, there was a lithograph which was published, and offered as proof that this took place. But, it did not. In 1823 Beethoven was totally deaf. In addition, he never attended any concerts performed by Liszt, though Schindler, his secretary, tried to convince him to attend.
So it amazes me that this young woman does so little research. If she wants to attract attention to the 200th birthday of Franz Liszt, why doesn’t she allow the music to do that? Wouldn’t it be grand if she used her position at the radio station to teach, rather than banging on with lurid rumors and silly comparisons?
Can it be that she truly thinks such nonsense will attract an audience? Liszt and his life and his performing ability are fascinating enough without resorting to drivel.
An all Dvořák program by the Colorado Chamber Players!
It has always amazed me that everyone knows who Antonin Dvořák is, but that he is still one of the most underrated composers in spite of his popularity. Everyone, of course, knows his New World Symphony (how many of you have ever gone to Spillville, Iowa, where he retreated from his uncomfortableness with high society in New York, and wrote the New World Symphony?), but no one seems to know his symphonic poems, which include The Noon Witch and The Water Goblin, however, many people do know that he was the composer of The Dumky Trio. I truly hope that all of you who read this article will become curious about this composer.
The Colorado Chamber Players presented a wonderful concert Friday evening of Dvořák at the South Suburban Christian Church inLittleton. The concept that inspired this program, and its title, was Dvořák in Love, and it involved readings taken from a novel with the same title, Dvořák in Love, about the composer and the first true love of his life, Josefina Cèrmáková (Even though Josefina was Dvořák’s first love, he married her sister Anna six years later). The novel was researched and written by Josef Škvorecký. On the surface, this may sound like a rather unusual thing to do at a concert of a major composer’s works, but it was done tastefully, and I hope that for all those in the audience, that it shed new light on this man’s life. Mare Trevathan was the guest artist who was asked to do the readings. She is a narrator at Talking Books and a member of the Curious Theater Company where she organizes literary arts/music events with the Colorado Chamber Players. She is also a theater director. The program opened with the Terzetto, Op. 74, for Two Violins and Viola. Keep in mind that Dvořák was a violist, and that is one of the reasons that he showed such special skill in writing chamber music. This work was written in the second week of January, 1887. It was inspired by a young chemistry student who was renting a room in the Dvořák’s house. He was an amateur violinist, and Dvořák thought that it would be fun to write a piece that the two of them could play together along with the student’s violin teacher. However, the piece proved to be too difficult for this young violinist, so Dvořák had to write another piece for violin and piano. The Terzetto is in four movements, the first of which is rather simple in structure. In fact, this entire work is considered by some as a salon piece, even though it is brilliantly written and a solid piece of music. The second movement is marked Larghetto, and Dvořák, very cleverly seems to have a counter melody, but this is only created by moving the middle voice up an octave. The third movement scherzo is absolutely marvelous to listen to, and the fourth movement is a theme and variations. It has been a long time since I have heard this piece, but I am quite sure that I heard five variations on the theme.
Paul Primus and Erik Peterson performed on violin, and Matthew Dane performed on the viola. Not only has it been a long time since I’ve heard this piece, but it has, unfortunately, been a long time since I’ve heard the Colorado Chamber Players perform. Paul Primus, Erik Peterson, and Matthew Dane are superb. Everyone, I’m sure, knows by now who Paul Primus is, and that he has been principal second violin with the Colorado Symphony since 1985.
Matthew Dane is a member of the Boulder Piano Quartet and serves as Principal Violist with the River Oaks Chamber Orchestra. He also is on the faculty at CU in Boulder, and performs with the Boulder Bach Festival. He was one of the performers in their stellar opening concert a few weeks ago.
Violinist Erik Peterson has been a member of the Colorado Symphony Orchestra since 1991, and he is Concertmaster of the Emerald City Opera, and Up Close and Musical. He is also the Artistic Director of the Chintimini Chamber Music Festival.
The instant that these three gentlemen began to perform, I was struck by their warmth of tone and the grace with which they played. All three demonstrated a consummate ease that I am quite sure was recognized by everyone in the audience – there was no shuffling around or rustling of programs. It was surprising to hear these three musicians perform together because they seemed to have such a uniformity of concept, and even the tone of their violins matched each other. They genuinely showed this audience how this piece should be performed.
Following the Terzetto, the Colorado Chamber Players performed excerpts from Cypresses: Echoes of Song, B. 152, which are selections arranged from songs which Dvořák wrote in July of 1865. B. 152 refers only to the arrangement for string quartet. Note that instead of an opus number for this work, there is a “B” number. The B indicates a thematic catalog of Antonin Dvořák’s complete works in chronological order. The B is the beginning letter of Jamil Berghauser’s last name, and he is the one who created the catalog. This can be somewhat confusing because there are nine thematic catalogs written by individuals whose last name begins with the letter B, however, if one is dealing only with Dvořák, then one knows that it is Berghauser. The original set of songs has a B number of 11, and they were written when Dvořák was only 24 years old. He had become acquainted with a book of poems by Czech author Gustav Pfleger-Moravský, and at the time he was infatuated with a young actress named Josefina Cèrmáková. This song cycle was Dvořák’s first attempt at songwriting, and the songs are full of emotion. It was during this work that actress and director, Mare Trevathan, read from these poems. It was very effective and completely unobtrusive and very well done.
The Colorado Chamber Players truly excelled in the performance of these pieces. Not only do the members of this organization know how to perform, but it seemed to me that their instruments, and the quality of sound they produced, matched each other amazingly well. I was immediately reminded of the old Budapest Quartet which I grew up listening to in my younger days. The CCP’s playing was incredibly liquid and extremely refined. This work makes use of five songs from the cycle: 1) I Know That on My Love, 2) In Many a Heart, Death Dwells, 4) Never Will Love Lead Us To That Glad Goal, 5) The Old Letter in My Book, 12) You ask Why My Songs Sound Stormy. In the second movement there is quite a bit of pizzicato playing, and the performers were absolutely together. I must say that I was quite struck by the cellist, Judith McIntyre, because her pizzicatos were so wonderfully shaped dynamically, and every single one of them was the same length and duration. And, concerning the duration, her pizzicato notes were almost portato, which means longer than pizzicato, but most certainly shorter than legato. And, in turn, that means I could truly here every single pitch that she was playing, rather than just some super short notes. The result was a genuine warmth of sound. Again, that musical consideration and thought reminded me of the Budapest Quartet. If any of you who read this article have never heard the Budapest Quartet, their recordings are still available, if you look hard enough. I suggest that you do, and as you listen to them, try and recall the performance that you heard this evening. The fourth movement of this performance was incredibly dulcet and quite flowing.
The last movement was full of passion and very strong emotion. A lot of the pleasure of this performance, of course, comes straight from the fact that Dvořák was so skilled at writing for strings. His chamber music is exceptional, and I am still so surprised that so many audiences are unfamiliar with his total output.
Following the intermission, the Colorado Chamber Players performed the Quintet in E Flat Major, Opus 97, which has been nicknamed the “American.” Like the New World Symphony, it was written in Spillville, Iowa, and it is based partly on Native and Black American themes. While Dvořák was in Spillville, he came in contact with Native Americans almost on a daily basis, and they performed their traditional songs and dances for him. This is a superb work, the third movement of which is a double variation, part of which is in a major key, and part of which is in a minor key (Can any of you readers identify the Haydn quartet that he may have used as a model?).
It is been a long time since I have heard a quartet, or in this case quintet, play with such precise and natural entrances. They seemed to do this without any effort at all. Barbara Hamilton Primus, one of the violists in this work, performs some beautiful solo work in the second movement. It was some of the most serene allegro playing I have heard in some time. In the third movement – which contains the double variation – the entrances can be a little tricky, at least, it seemed that way to me. But they were all beautifully accomplished. All four movements of this quintet seem to be the result of genuine musical sharing amongst the members. Their dynamics were absolutely in union, and that is what Dvořák called for. The phrasing was done with a marvelous sense of ensemble. Quite frankly, hearing this quintet reminded me very much of the time I was in Dvořák’s apartment in Spillville (I had played a concert at a nearby college), and I saw the room and the desk where he composed this work.
It seems unnecessary to discuss the quality of a composer’s output, when that composer has had his output already reviewed so long ago. I don’t have to say that Dvořák was a good composer because that has already been established. But on the other hand, there are so many people in today’s audiences who know only one work. And as I said at the beginning of this article, he is highly underrated. There is no question in my mind whatsoever that the Colorado Chamber Players persuaded some of the members of the audience that he needs to be heard more often, because his music creates pure joy.
So do the Colorado Chamber Players.
The Denver Eclectic Concert Series and The Trio Cordilleras present a World Premiere
October 14, 2011, 6:15 pm
Filed under:
Reviews | Tags:
Alejandro Cremaschi,
Cordilleras Trio,
D'Rivera,
Denver Eclectic Concerts,
Ecos de Fiesta,
Elizabeth Kipper,
Francini,
Gaito,
Luis Gonzalez,
Piazzolla,
Thomas Heinrich,
Turnia
A cordillera, in both English and Spanish, is a chain of mountains, and many refer to The Cordilleras as the long chain that joins the Americas together, from Argentina to Canada. There is a piano trio in Denver that has been newly named The Trio Cordilleras, and I say newly named because they have been in existence for a scant few years now. On Thursday, October 13, this trio gave a fine performance as guests of the Denver Eclectic Concerts in the Mortgage West Gallery of the Plum Building on South Pearl in Denver. This trio specializes in South American, Latin American, and the US music (hence their name), and has recorded the works of Colorado’s own Luis Jorge Gonzalez.
The pianist in this trio is Alejandro Cremaschi, who is on the piano faculty at the University of Colorado in Boulder. Praised as an intelligent and sensitive performer, Alejandro Cremaschi was born in Mendoza, Argentina. He currently teaches piano and piano pedagogy at the University of Colorado at Boulder in the United States. He received a Doctorate degree in Piano Performance from the University of Minnesota, and undergraduate degrees from the Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, in Argentina, and the University of Maryland. He has performed in numerous cities worldwide, including an appearance as a soloist with the Argentine National Symphony Orchestra, the Cuyo Symphony Orchestra and other orchestras in Argentina and the United States.
Elizabeth Kipper is the violinist with this trio, and until recently, was a member of the Colorado Symphony Orchestra. She has also performed with the Fort Worth Symphony. She is a Juilliard graduate, and has served as Concertmaster under the conductor Seiji Ozawa when she was a fellow at Tanglewood. Like Alejandro Cremaschi, she has performed throughout the world.
Thomas Heinrich, the cellist in the trio, has been a member of the Colorado Symphony Orchestra since 1997. He is a graduate of the Eastman School of Music and the Cleveland Institute of Music, and made his solo debut with the Vermont Symphony Orchestra at the age of sixteen. Thomas also is assistant principal cellist of The Santa Fe Opera orchestra. For seven seasons he served as Principal Cellist of the Grand Teton Music Festival orchestra. In 1990, he performed as assistant principal cellist under Leonard Bernstein at the Pacific Music Festival. He has performed at the Strings in the Mountains (Steamboat), Chintimini, Wintergreen (VA), Bravo! Vail, June in Buffalo, and Bellingham music festivals.
The first work on the program was the Trio, Opus 25, by the Argentine composer, Constantino Gaito. Gaito (1878-1945) was born and died in Buenos Aires, but being of Italian parents with steadfast connections to Italy, he received his early musical training in Milan. He also studied at the Conservatory of Naples, where he was trained as a composer, conductor and pianist. Gaito’s works include ten operas, three ballets, an oratorio, four symphonic poems, three suites, five overtures, chamber works, piano pieces and songs, as well as textbooks for vocal and piano lessons.
I was unfamiliar with this composer until the performance of this piece. Considering the composer’s study in Europe, and the dates of his life, it was no surprise that this was a fairly traditional romantic era composition. It was clear however, that in spite of his harmonies that reminded me of César Franck, Constantino Gaito has his own voice, but I was a little surprised at its lack of South American influence. The first movement was wonderfully lush, and yet quite intense. It relies very much on the violinist to produce this intensity, but there was much hard work done by the cellist and pianist as well. The second movement was surprisingly short. It was lyrical and wonderful to listen to. The third movement also had harmonic structure that, again, reminded me very much of Franck, with sudden harmonic changes that relied on a common tone. The overall impression of this trio left me thinking that it could have come from the date, say, of 1850, rather than after the turn of the 20th Century. It was obviously difficult, but this trio of musicians was superb, and they are obviously accustomed to performing together, let alone their innate sense of ensemble.
The next work on the program was the Trio Nr. 2, Opus 76, by the well-known Spanish composer, Joaquin Turina. Turina began his formal studies of harmony theory and counterpoint in 1894, and almost immediately he began to compose small pieces. In 1902 he moved to Madrid where he quickly became involved in the musical scene, and where the premier of his opera, Zarzuela La Sulamita was given. In 1905, he, as most other Spanish composers of the time, went to Paris. He studied piano briefly with Moszkowsky, and theory under Vicent d’Indy in the Schola Cantorum. He became good friends with Albeniz and da Falla, and it was Albeniz who encouraged him to find inspiration in the popular music of Spain and Andalucía. His quintet that was premiered in Paris was given the Op. 1 as the beginning of a new way composing. In 1914 he returned to Madrid where he divided his time between composing, teaching and performing. Turina died in Madrid on the 14th of January 1949.
The Trio Nr. 2, Opus 76, is in a very clear Sonata form. The first movement has contrasting themes, followed by the usual development and recapitulation. Like the second movement of the Gaito, the second movement of this trio is also brief, but it is a scherzo rather than a slow movement. However, the trio (think of it as a middle section) is quite relaxed and unhurried. The third movement is a Rondo, in which previous themes of the first two movements lead to a finale. The performance of this piece was absolutely marvelous. But, in a way, why shouldn’t it be? These are three consummate musicians who spend much of their time performing chamber music. Beth Kipper was incredibly accurate on the high notes in the second movement, and her shaping of phrases was really beyond compare. Cremaschi is a consummate pianist, and wherever necessary, allowed Heinrich and Kipper to lead the way. He certainly created some very dark moments in the third movement. Among musicians, this piece is well known, but it would be wonderful if it was performed more often.
After the intermission, a World Premiere was given by The Trio Cordilleras of a new work written by CU Professor Emeritus, Luis Jorge Gonzalez. Gonzalez’ music has been widely performed throughout the United States, and in South America, Europe, and Japan. His musical awards include a Guggenheim Fellowship (1978-79) and compositional prizes from the Wieniawski International Competition, the City of Trieste, Radio France, the Percussive Arts Society, and the American Harp Society among others. Commissions from Boulder Philharmonic Orchestra, the Colorado Music Festival, the American Guild of Organists, the Cosanti Foundation, the Austin Texas Music Festival, and many universities and performing ensembles fill a long and impressive professional resume. Luis Jorge Gonzalez was born in San Juan, Argentina, in 1936. After study at the Universidad Nacional de Cuyo in Mendoza, Argentina, in the early 1970s he enrolled in the Peabody Conservatory in Baltimore, Maryland, where he studied with Robert Hall Lewis and Earle Brown. Initially attracted to the musical avant garde, over the years he abandoned radical innovation and returned to tonality but with great imagination and individual perspective. He taught briefly at the Peabody Conservatory and in Austin, Texas, before coming to the College of Music of the University of Colorado at Boulder in 1982 as a Professor of Composition and Music Theory. He retired from that position in 2003, but still resides in the Boulder area where he composes and is active in civic and university musical affairs.
This World Premiere is entitled Ecos de Fiesta, and is comprised of three pieces, Habañera, Joropo, and Conga. I have heard many compositions by Luis Gonzalez, and this one was noticeably different, even upon first hearing. It is not unusual for Gonzalez to use fairly thick textures, but all three movements (if I may call them that) of this piece were crystal clear, and rather light and texture. All three movements are dance forms familiar throughout South and Latin America: the Habañera is from Cuba, the Joropo is a waltz from Venezuela, and the Conga is also from Cuba. Sometimes it can be a little difficult picking out musical structures and technique upon first hearing, but aside from the typical dance forms that Gonzalez uses, there seemed to be a reliance on counterpoint. I really need to hear these three pieces again, but I am sincere when I say that I am looking forward to it. Luis Gonzalez has a very unique and profound way of showing us a new world, and then inviting us to enter. This was a splendid World Premiere in every sense of the word. This work, Ecos de Fiesta, comprised of three pieces, is delightful, and it is a work which is characteristic of the distinguished artfulness of everything that Luis Gonzalez has written. I only wish that, in spite of the cozy surroundings at this performance, there had been a larger audience.
The Trio Cordilleras closed this rare performance with three composers: Danzon by Paquito D’ivera, La vi Ilegar by Enrique Francini, and two works by the well-known Astor Piazzolla, La Muerte del Angel and Milonga en Re.
When I say rare performance, I am not only thinking of the all too infrequent appearance of The Trio Cordilleras, but I am also considering the vigorousness and musicality inherent in the way they play. Other organizations should take note. I truly hope that the Denver Eclectic Concert organization can improve their publicity and notoriety, for this was a performance which many musicians truly needed to hear.
The Colorado Symphony Orchestra
It was with an enormous sigh of relief, that I received a series of e-mails from the Colorado Symphony these past 10 days. I think that the Colorado Symphony Orchestra is finally in a winning position, and I for one, would like to welcome back Jerome H. Kern and Mary Rossick Kern. In addition, I would like to welcome back Jim Copenhaver. Keep in mind that I am not associated with the Colorado Symphony in any way, but these individuals have, once again, made it clear that they have the best interests of the symphony in mind, and the knowledge of how to allow the CSO to succeed, as well as how to lead it.